Formative and summative assessments: English-majored students’ perceptions and expectations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65956/ltlt.2026.57

Keywords:

perceptions, formative assessment, summative assessment, English majors, expectations

Abstract

Assessment is a compulsory and regular activity at all educational levels in Vietnam to measure students’ learning outcomes through their courses. On the one hand, it helps instructors identify the students’ strengths and shortcomings. From that, they can apply appropriate teaching methods and approaches in order to achieve teaching and learning goals. On the other hand, it creates motivation for students’ learning process. At the same time, students can make their own study plans or strategies to gain better results in their academic achievements. There are two popular forms of assessing students’ performances, namely formative and summative assessments which are shared by many authors and educators. The purpose of the study was to figure out English-majored students’ perceptions and their expectation of the formative and summative assessments in their courses. The participants were 87 English majors at Tra Vinh University. The instruments included the questionnaire and the interview. The questionnaire focused on students’ perceptions when accessing these two modes of assessment. The interview related to their expectations towards the future implementation of the formative and summative assessment. The results were beneficial for relevant stakeholders including students, lecturers, course designers, and the institution. The recommendations were also meaningful to neighbouring universities to assist students in overcoming their issues and getting better results in their further tests or exams. 

References

Akmaral, E., & Biloliddin, S. (2024). Advantages and disadvantages of summative and formative assessment in education. International Scientific Journal, 3(12), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14278925

Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students’ perceptions of e-assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 147-153. https://www.tojet.net/articles/v16i1/16113.pdf

Amalia, R. (2018). Students’ perception of online assessment use in Schoology in EFL classrooms [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/28639/

Anwar, M., & Hameed, F. M. (2016). Students’ perceptions towards formative and summative assessment: A single institution study. Journal of Islamic International Medical College, 11(1), 35-40. https://journals.riphah.edu.pk/index.php/jiimc/article/view/935

Areekkuzhiyil, S. (2021). Issues and concerns in classroom assessment practices. Edutracks, 20(8), 20-23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613841.pdf

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. McGraw-Hill.

Boualem, B., & Mohamed, M. (2021). Investigating students’ attitude towards online assessment during the pandemic of corona virus disease 19. Journal of Faslo El-Khitab, 10(4), 259-274.

Burn, C. C. (2010). Perception. In D. S. Mills, J. N. Marchant-Forde, P. D. McGreevy, D. B. Morton, C. J. Nicol, C. J. C. Phillips, P. Sandøe, & R. R. Swaisgood (Eds.), The encyclopedia of applied animal behaviour and welfare (pp. 459-461). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851997247.0000

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dang, T. T. (2024). Cultural and situational constraints on undergraduate students’ performance of learner autonomy in EFL learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1791-1799. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.04

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

French, S., Dickerson, A., & Mulder, R. A. (2024). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. Higher Education, 88(3), 893-918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01148-z

Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2011). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. Association for Middle Level Education. https://www.amle.org/formative-and-summative-assessments-in-the-classroom/

Ghozali, A. S., & Tyas, P. A. (2022). The importance of formative assessment based on students’ perception. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(2), 218-222. https://doi.org/10.29210/184500

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Hardiyanti, K. (2016). English teachers’ perceptions of the use of media [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto].

Ho, B. N., & Dang, T. T. (2019). Impacts of online formative assessment on EFL students’ writing achievement. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 9(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.9.1.271.2019

Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Allyn & Bacon.

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

Kivuti, N. B. (2015). Influence of formative evaluation on learner performance in mathematics in secondary schools in Embu County, Kenya [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Nairobi.

Lestari, Y. I. F. (2023). The students’ perceptions on using blended learning in ELT during COVID-19 at SMPN 1 Wates [Undergraduate thesis]. State Islamic Institute of Kediri.

Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl013

Ministry of Education and Training. (2021). Circular promulgating the regulations on university-level training of the Ministry of Education and Training (Circular No. 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT).

Mulia, D. (2019). Teachers’ assessment types in English classroom [Undergraduate thesis]. Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University.

Mustamin, R. (2024). The role of formative and summative assessment in improving learning quality and student learning outcomes. Journal of Strategy and Transformation in Educational Management, 1(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.62012/jostem.v1i1.4

Pan, Y. C. (2020). Taiwan university students’ perceptions of summative and formative classroom assessment in English courses. TESOL International Journal, 15(2), 46-64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1268467.pdf

Pramesti, I. D. A. M. M. (2024). Exploring the benefits of formative assessment in the classroom. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 188-194. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.16142

Rocco, S. (2007). Online assessment and evaluation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(113), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.249

Rubie-Davies, C. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761251

Tra Vinh University. (2021). Decision on the promulgation of regulations on the organization of course evaluation of Tra Vinh University (Decision No. 4363/QD-DHTV).

White-Blackburn, G. (1977). The effects of trained and untrained proctors on student performance and satisfaction in a PSI course [Master’s thesis, University of the Pacific]. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/443

Yambi, T. D. A. C., & Yambi, C. (2018). Assessment and evaluation in education. University Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Zilany, M. S., & Yakub, I. (2024, June). WIP: The impact of formative assessment on students’ attitude, anticipated academic performance, and design skills: Insights from three design-oriented electrical engineering courses [Paper presentation]. 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--48318

Downloads

How to Cite

Trinh, B. N., & Trinh, N. T. M. (2026). Formative and summative assessments: English-majored students’ perceptions and expectations. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning Today, 1(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.65956/ltlt.2026.57
Received: 25-03-2026
Accepted: 08-06-2026
Published: 10-06-2026

Full-text Version

Published:

10-06-2026

Data Availability Statement

The research data is available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIbLUNeNaUE9J6KE8PFEcSWfF3l3Ya7O/view?usp=sharing

 

 

 

Issue

Section

Empirical Research Articles